Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MarketMind
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-19 17:22:40
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (1975)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Russian fighter jet damages US Reaper drone with flare over Syria: Officials
- Malala Yousafzai on winning the Nobel Peace Prize while in chemistry class
- Is Mittens your muse? Share your pet-inspired artwork with NPR
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- After tragic loss, Marc Maron finds joy amidst grief with 'From Bleak to Dark'
- How should we be 'Living'? Kurosawa and Ishiguro tackle the question, 70 years apart
- George Saunders on how a slaughterhouse and some obscene poems shaped his writing
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- 'Shrinking' gets great work from a great cast
Ranking
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Louder Than A Riot Returns Thursday, March 16
- 'Return to Seoul' is about reinvention, not resolution
- Want to be a writer? This bleak but buoyant guide says to get used to rejection
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Secretary of State Antony Blinken on his musical alter ego
- Leo DiCaprio's dating history is part of our obsession with staying young forever
- M3GAN, murder, and mass queer appeal
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend viewing
2023 Oscars Preview: Who will win and who should win
'I Have Some Questions For You' is a dark, uncomfortable story that feels universal
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Harvey Weinstein will likely spend the rest of his life in prison after LA sentence
'Wait Wait' for March 4, 2023: With Not My Job guest Malala Yousafzai
Reneé Rapp wants to burn out by 30 — and it's all going perfectly to plan